Comments on: “Still in”? American climate policy after Paris https://energytransition.org/2017/06/still-in-american-climate-policy-after-paris/ The Global Energiewende Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:05:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.1 By: US cities leading the climate battle - FueladdictsFueladdicts https://energytransition.org/2017/06/still-in-american-climate-policy-after-paris/#comment-6141 Wed, 06 Dec 2017 15:36:05 +0000 https://energytransition.org/?p=15310#comment-6141 […] US cities reduce emissions enough to keep the country anywhere near its Paris goals? (A reminder: the US target was 26% below 2005 levels by […]

]]>
By: James Wimberley https://energytransition.org/2017/06/still-in-american-climate-policy-after-paris/#comment-5640 Sat, 01 Jul 2017 10:25:40 +0000 https://energytransition.org/?p=15310#comment-5640 PS: the lamentable self-immolation of the Green Climate Fund on a pyre of its own red tape also argues for more direct citizen and community funding models. The sort of big projects that can afford the standard mountain of paperwork can already get funding from the existing multilateral development banks like the World Bank, who are at least experienced in the business.

]]>
By: James Wimberley https://energytransition.org/2017/06/still-in-american-climate-policy-after-paris/#comment-5629 Wed, 28 Jun 2017 09:31:15 +0000 https://energytransition.org/?p=15310#comment-5629 The US NDC commitments, and Obama’s Clean Power Plan regulations to get there, only represented a modest nudge beyond the BAU scenario based on previous market trends and policy. Trump and Pruitt will also weaken fuel efficiency standards for cars, but this will have little effect on the growth of electric vehicles, which are an order of magnitude more carbon-efficient. So quite modest additional efforts by states and cities (especially those in red states) could quite probably secure overall US compliance.

What these efforts will not do is (a) lead the way to higher ambition and stricter targets, (b) provide the US share of the climate finance promised for poor countries. Seattle has acknowledged the finance issue, but it’s an exception. City-to-city and state-level programmes can only do so much anyway. Fortunately, renewables are now so cheap and reliable that enough finance may be available on market terms, as with India. The big finance problem may lie on the adaptation side: giant Dutch sea walls cannot be built as commercial investments.

]]>